Click on Potassium-Argon Dating II to see the second page which contains a possible scenario that would allow K-Ar dates to make sense within a short age chronology. And this is a little bit redundant. What is Potassium 40? We do not have an issue of weight of evidence. Many text books say it is self-evident.
Because what's cool about argon, and we study this a little bit in the chemistry playlist, it is a noble gas, it is unreactive. And so when it is embedded in something that's in a liquid state it'll kind of just bubble out. It's not bonded to anything, and so it'll just bubble out and just go out into the atmosphere.
So what's interesting about this whole situation is you can imagine what happens during a volcanic eruption. Let me draw a volcano here.
Potassium-argon (K-Ar) dating
So let's say that how does potassium argon dating work is our volcano. And it erupts at some time in the past. So it erupts, and you have all of this lava flowing. That lava will contain some amount of potassium And actually, it'll already contain some amount of argon But what's neat about argon is that while it's lava, while it's in this liquid state-- so let's imagine this lava right over here. It's a bunch of stuff right over here.
I'll do the potassium And let me do it in a color that I haven't used yet. I'll do the potassium in magenta. It'll have some potassium in it. I'm maybe over doing it. It's a very scarce isotope. But it'll have some potassium in it. And it might how does potassium argon dating work have some argon in it just like that.
Online dating blog argon is a noble gas.
It's not going to bond anything. And while this lava is in a liquid state it's going to be able to bubble out. It'll just float to the top. It has no bonds. And it'll just evaporate. I shouldn't say evaporate. It'll just bubble out essentially, because it's not bonded to anything, and it'll sort of just seep out while we are in a liquid state. And what's really interesting about that is that when you have these volcanic eruptions, and because this argon is seeping out, by the time this lava has hardened into volcanic rock-- and I'll do that volcanic rock in a different color.
By the time it has hardened into volcanic rock all of the argon will be gone. It won't be there anymore. How is the Atomic Clock Set? When rocks are heated to the melting point, any Ar contained in them is released into the atmosphere. When the rock recrystallizes it becomes impermeable to gasses again.DATING APP WITH RATING SYSTEM
As the K in the rock decays into Ar, the gas is trapped in the rock. The Decay Profile In this simulation, a unit of molten rock cools and crystallizes. The ratio of K to Ar is plotted. Note that time is expressed in millions of years on this graph, as opposed to thousands of years in the C graph. Click on the "Show Movie" button below to view this animation.
K-Ar Decay Profile. How are Samples Processed? Most scientists do not believe that the short chronology of the Bible has any validity at all and most would consider it counterproductive to pursue such a course of investigation.
If in fact such an answer were found, it would be quickly dismissed. It would be assumed that there was something wrong with the idea or the data, and a new scenario would be sought. Some papers give evidence of presenting filtered data. What is meant by filtered data, is that they only present the data that agrees with evolutionary thinking. The other data is eliminated.RAYA DATING APP FOR CELEBRITIES
Am J Sci ; This paper is now considered to be a classic paper. Yet they use biotite in an uncritical manor in other areas where the dates they obtained matched their expectations. On Pagewe can also note: "Unfortunately many of the samples that passed field inspection for suitability and were laboriously collected, later proved unsuitable for dating.
Thus, of some 65 samples collected by M. Skinner, only 10 could be used. Sometimes the whole rock basalt date is reported, but sometimes only a mineral fraction is reported from the basalt, like biotite or sanidine. Why is it that one type of date is used one time and not at another time, is not discussed in the paper. As Paul Giem notes: "If there are three mineral fractions per basalt sample, there are four different possible dates for that sample. Thus one could pick the dates that fit one's expectations and create a very impressive how does potassium argon dating work of dates with close agreement without there being more than a general correlation of most dates with one's expectations.
It should be remembered that these researchers are not being dishonest in their actions. They think of the long age scenario of evolution as being fact. They do not believe that there is any alternative way to look at history. So when the data does not come out right, it is only natural that they assume that there is something wrong with the dates that do not fit the long age viewpoint. However, when they turn around and say that the data supports the evolutionary how does potassium argon dating work and not the Creationary viewpoint.
This is not right! The data does not support long ages. So, many people try to say something like: the weight of evidence proves evolution; or, all the data supports evolution. But this is not true either, the weight of evidence does not prove anything. We do not have an issue of weight of evidence. Rather, what we have is weight of interpretation! This controversy is not over data. The data can go either way.
Very intelligent people believe in the long history of the earth and they have good data to support them. There is no question about it. However, I look at that same data how does potassium argon dating work I come to very different conclusions. This process is legitimate! There is such a thing as multiple interpretation to the data base. There is no proof for either position. On this web page I want to discuss a possible scenario that would allow K-Ar dates to indicate a short age chronology.
Such a discussion might never be allowed in normal scientific circles because of the assumptions they choose to believe as being true. There is such a strong consensus of opinion on K-Ar dating and other similar topics that deal with the history of the Earth that alternative viewpoints are probably viewed as being counterproductive. Before we start, lets look at the specific K-Ar dating assumptions. The rate of decay half-lifeand the branching how does potassium argon dating work, of K have not changed.
The material in question lost all its argon at an identifiable time, the reset time. No argon has been lost since the time the rock was reset, or set to zero. No potassium has been gained or lost since the reset time, except by decay. The ratio of K to total K is constant. The total K, Ar, and Ar in the material in question can all be measured accurately. The seventh assumption is one that scientists are doing their best to fulfill.
We should also be able to safely make this assumption. The sixth assumption is also fairly secure. When the concentrations of the various K isotopes are measured, the results are always the same.
The fifth assumption is fairly safe. There are some cases where K has been gained or lost; However, the mineral itself has been noticeably altered. The fourth assumption is probably satisfied for most samples.
However, this is an assumption that could be challenged. If the rock was heated in the presence of Argon from the earth's mantle, free christian dating sites perhaps in some primordial Argon which might have had a higher concentration of Ar 36; we might have problems making this assumption.
According to most texts on Potassium-Argon dating, the third assumption is fairly commonly violated. Metamorphism, weathering, and reheating are some of the processes that are mentioned to cause a loss of Argon in the crystal of a rock. Most sedimentary rocks are thought to lose Argon because the crystal structure leaks Argon.
A loss of Argon would cause the rock to date younger than it should according to evolutionary thought. This is probably the assumption that scientists make when they choose to present filtered data in a scientific paper. They see the young dates as those samples that have lost Argon.
It is an assumption that they probably view as having no alternatives, yet if this same issue was ever pursued, it might uncover other possibilities suggesting a short age time scenario.
Another possibility is that the second assumption is being violated rather than the third. Some samples will not how does potassium argon dating work fully reset, initially.
Thus these rocks give a date which is older than what normally would happen if the rocks were fully reset. These older dating rocks give the kind of dates as expected by the scientific community. On the other hand, those rocks that date younger, would not need dating a swedish guy have had Argon leak from the crystal after the time when the reseting process occurs.
Instead, the rock was probably more completely reset when it was molten. This means that there was less Argon in the rocks to begin with, because the younger dating rocks were more fully set to zero in the reseting process. The second assumption sounds logical at first.Potassium-argon (K-Ar) dating - Cosmology & Astronomy - Khan Academy
Many text books say it is self-evident. Stanford University Press, p. This is because Ar 40 is an inert gas that does not combine chemically with any other element and so escapes easily from rocks when they are heated.
Thus, while a rock is molten the Ar 40 formed by the decay of K 40 escapes from the liquid. There are reasons and evidences for challenging the second assumption. The first assumption is often challenged by some creationists. One of the complications that must be how does potassium argon dating work is that of the production of 39 Ar by neutron scattering from the calcium content of the mineral sample. There are also complications with the atomospheric argon content and various argon contamination scenarios.
The details are best pursued in a dedicated text like McDougall and Harrison. This allows the 39 Ar population to be used as a proxy for the 40 K content of the sample to make possible the calculation of the age for the sample. This simplified conceptual treatment does not give a fair picture of the detailed design and execution of age determinations for a wide variety of types of geological samples.
But it hopefully makes the point that Ar-Ar dating can take data from small samples based on mass spectrometry. It has contributed to the vast collection of age data for earth minerals, moon samples and meteorites.Potassium-argon Dating
The Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the geological age scale was associated with an iridium-rich layer which suggested that the layer was caused by an impact with an extraterrestrial object.
Because that time period, commonly referred to as the K-T boundary, was associated with the extinction of vast numbers of animals in the fossil record, much effort was devoted to dating it with potassium-argon and other methods of geochronology. The time of 65 million years was associated with the K-T boundary from these studies. Other large impact craters such as the Manson crater in Iowa dated to 74 My were examined carefully as candidates for the cause of the how does potassium argon dating work, but none were close to the critical time.
Chicxulub was not so obvious as a candidate because much of the evidence for it was under the sea. More attention was directed to the Yucatan location after published work by Alan Hildebrand in demonstrated the chemical similarity of Chicxulub core samples with material found distributed in the K-T boundary layer. Carl Swisher organized a team to produce three independent measurements of the age of intact glass beads from the C-1 core drill site in the Chicxulub impact area.