Mlp chat room

Niril

Post your thoughts below, even if you think the current system is fine. You can buy yourself a slot on different sections of the page! I believe action should be taken if the harassed user takes it to the mods, which I think is the right thing to do in that situation, since harassment shouldn't even be happening in the first place. Mlp chat room [PUNIQRANDLINE-(au-dating-names.txt)

How do I become a mod? Send me Wooden-Flashlight a Note. The application format is listed below, but please read the types of mods and their roles first. We need mods who will vote on specific types of art. They need to be judged for their quality standard, maturity, and to make sure it's not theft, or mlp chat room without permission- or generally breaking the rules of the group or Mlp chat room. I'll explain the general job of each team.

Here's the folder guide for submitting. I'll be opening the gallery now but it'll take a little while to get all the folders set up! Please be patient! Twilight and Rainbow Dash?

Rarity and Spike? Before she was a Princess she was a very talented unicorn. Her images go here. Princess Twilight has her own folder.

BerryTube Chat Reaction Holiday Special - Best Gift Ever

This is for Flutterbat alone. We're back in business! Mlp chat room know, right? I'm sure a lot of you thought the group was dead! Long story short; the reason the group was closed for so long [read: the entire of season 4 ] was because DeviantART was simply not working with me in organizing the gallery like I wanted.

MLP group chat (Don’t disturb Celestia when sleeping XD)

But, the gallery is fully organized now and I will be putting up a folder guide later today, then finally opening the group again! The usual limits apply: 1 Deviation, per folder, per week.

We still have a quality standard and to not allow mature art. I put it there because some people, myself included, prefers how my work looks and is presented on other sites, such.

Heads up! Each situation is dealt by a case-by-case basis. If gross misconduct is observed, the user in question is subject to having their rights revoked immediately by an Administrator. What constitutes as gross misconduct is free dating australia no credit card to the discretion of the administrator at the time.

If the person in question happens to be an administrator, users are asked to contact and alternative Administrator. If anyone has any concerns, please contact an Administrator. Sign In Don't have an account?

Start a Wiki. For help appealing a ban, please read below. Contents [ show ]. This is grounds for an immediate removal of rights and possibly further action as asking for personal information is also strictly against Wikia's terms of use. Moderators may not ban on suspicion of a user being underaged, nor may they ban on an implication of such for example, a user saying that they are in grade 5 in school is not grounds to ban on Screenshot evidence from other users is not a reliable source in this instance Moderators must be willing to back up their actions if they are questioned Support to support the banning of underage users and the regulations for moderators, Mlp chat room to continue as we are now with regards to underage users, i.

Conclusion : Nothing to vote on here. Can be brought up at a later date. Moderators may not ban on suspicion of a user being underaged, nor may they ban on an implication of such for example, mlp chat room, a user saying that they are in grade 5 in school is not grounds to ban on Screenshot evidence from other users is not a reliable source in this instance Moderators must be willing to back up their actions if they are questioned Edit: Additionally, there mlp chat room be no genociding of users known to be under 13 if this is passed.

Forum:Chatroom next steps

Edit 2: See below for updates on regulations Support to support the banning of underage users and the regulations for moderators, Oppose to continue as we are now with regards to underage users, i.

The following guidelines are to be followed by moderators and administrators at all times concerning underage users: Moderators may not pick and choose who gets banned for mlp chat room Moderators must never inquire about a user's age and then give a ban if they turn out to be underage. Moderators may not ban on suspicion of a mlp chat room being underaged, nor may they ban on an implication of such for example, a user saying that they are in grade 5 in school is not grounds to ban on Screenshot evidence from other users is not a reliable source in this instance Evidence from places outside of the chatroom is not considered valid Moderators must be willing to back up their actions if they are questioned with proof from the chat logs or otherwise In other words, the only reason a ban should ever be given for a user being underage is if they state in the chatroom that they are under the age of Categories : Chat discussion Archives.

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page.

Error: Your browser must allow scripting for Chatzy to function

Direct any additional comments to Mlp chat room discussion. My problem with this is that our nomination process is too laxative. Not everyone is capable of being a mod. Don't get me wrong, being a good user should be considered, but that shouldn't mlp chat room the only consideration.

Just because a user is kindhearted doesn't mean that are capable. We have mods that are pretty lackluster because of how laxative it is. I don't mean to offend anyone, but from what I had observed, many current mods are too incompetent.

Just because someone may seem like a strong candidate, does not necessarily mean they make competent moderators. There's too many nominations which are just friends being nominated by other friends for example, Jorge Esquivel's nomination. T RIPLE JAYFebruary 1, Fucking older women I myself prefer the old system compared to what we are having now, people are just nominating themselves just to be more popular and their friends because they greeted them, making a trusted admin make the choices is much more productive and reasonable.

Originally, as stated, the "old" process of making new chatmods was that admins made users chatmods at their own discretion.

REDDIT CHAT ROOMS APP

Then we moved to a one-stop shop voting of new candidates, which worked for a little while, but then we realized it was going to hell like it is now.

When we wanted to go back to admin discussion, we made it too transparent. It used to be done in fully-private discussions on Skype. It should have gone back to it that way. Now we want to rid of the Suggestions step. All it is a glorified version of the August October? As in someone to make sure the mods are doing their jobs, mlp chat room, and to maybe keep this person lay'd down low in the chat.

I mlp chat room seen many mods unworthy of being a "mod. Sometimes, they just don't care unless someone else cares, or just aren't vigilient enough. Some mods are also to strict, while others may indeed be to soft. However, I have never seen a to kind of a mod yet. Infact, I've probably only seen more rude stricter ones. Maybe its time we research a more advanced style instead of going back to the older one? If that one didn't work so well then, it most likely won't do any good now.

I think, since the whole point of the voting is to let the people choose, that we should allow all users to vote within a one week period. Flutterbutter talkFebruary 3, UTC I just closed Fony's nomination which best mens dating profile pictures failed because the support votes didn't outnumber the oppose votes to a large enough degree.

The oppose votes were lazy, poorly thought out, and didn't actually serve a purpose other than say "No". When you oppose someone, you state why you oppose them. You don't just tell them "no". Why can't they do it? Just saying they can't isn't a helpful to the discussion or to the user who is nominated.

The rights weren't given willy-nilly, and the admins who did promote people back then did so after prolonged mlp chat room consideration and monitoring - it wasn't a block vote of support, only because they were their friend.

Mlp chat room that I proposed this almost a year ago - it originally had a lot of support, but in the end it was denied. I'd like to have another shot at it at some stage. This is also a problem. Just because the chat lacks mods at certain times does not mean "we don't have enough mods. Just because someone can mod, doesn't mean they can do it well. I mean, perhaps all the mods just pile in from one time zone or two.

BILLY COSTA AND JENNY JOHNSON DATING

But I would definetly feel safer if it was just "More than 1 non active mod at night time. Yet if they are a strong candidate, they can be a "back up mod. Kind of like a temp i suppose.

This way we can be sure that we have each time zone filled with good mods. But I do think that we should do something like boost the time you must spend on wiki from three months to something more like five-six. This way we can be sure the mods we choose are good find my friends cheating spouse certified for the mlp chat room.

Eidlover talkFebruary 3, UTC There have been times where users have gotten away with cussing using the links they post to appropriate pcitures, pointing out the links to others and laughing about it.

CelestiaOfEquestriaFebruary 11, UTC I believe action should be taken if the harassed user takes it to mlp chat room mods, which I think is the right thing to do in that situation, since harassment shouldn't even be happening in the first place. Flutterbutter talkFebruary 12, UTC By that logic though, we're allowing harassment to occur in PM's which is not acceptable.

I'm sorry, but I have to completely disagree with this, mlp chat room. Bronymon Game Dev Site -February 13, UTC Talk about religion is perfectly allowed, but arguments about it get stopped like any other argument Anyone can get offended by anything. This isn't a nanny state. Vague statements like "a few others I know of" don't form a valid argument. This is both something good and bad, some mods would prevent things from sparking up at first because they sense it will cause hassle or some will just go with the rules and only break people up when the fuse reaches breaking point, and that is kind of counter-productive since the fuse was already lit and keeping it lit until it reaches near its end doesn't seem like something nice to me.

An example is lyrics - post one line, most won't care, but a few would jump on the "offender's" case. To me, there is a difference between being heavy- and light-handed with the rules and actually using discretion on a day-to-day basis. But know I do not think mods should have this sort of power. It can seem to make some "super-powered-regular's" of a chat. And this has been done to win arguments, over end them rightfully, at times I've noticed, with the person being threatend and thrown into submission for a minor offence, or just ended up throwing a bigger fuss, with mods backing each side.

Mostly the mod however, because the person was a mod, and their excuse was "Please obey mods discretion, or be kicked. And then get told down by the majority like it was "So It seems I am misunderstood for the second time in this forum. I said discretion is not a problem, as it is case-by-case and fair. It's when people are always left or always right on the severity of an issue is when we need to step in and settle things correctly.

This way we will not have users unfairly banned or punished. This will clear up many problems we have with insta bans. With things such as socks, we should have full proof that the user is one before banning them, this way no mistakes are made, instead of having one to two users coming up and saying, sites for sick people think this persons a sock," and then insta banning them we should have users devoted to finding socks and getting rid of them.

SINGLES WHATSAPP GROUP

This way we can continue to find socks, but keep the following of the rules safe. I think no mod has the right to change the rules of banning or kicking on a user they dislike or like depending on the circumstances because it may be unfair to other users or the user getting in trouble. Flutterbutter talkFebruary 3, UTC The moderators do enforce the guidelines, but they are too vague.

Three lines of caps could be spam to one mod, but not spam to another. This dating sites for sick people leads to difficulties. The rules need to be updated to define how many lines are spam, what constitutes as spam, etc. Some users dislike the sometimes very random nature in the chat. I think that roleplaying of any kind has no place on a general chat.

The problem is that limiting it is difficult; once you allow a little, you're allowing it all because users will claim that the Mods have turned a blind eye to someone else doing the same thing. If people want their own on-line MLP text RPG and the like, there are plenty of hosting sites that can provide them with the resources to do so; don't spam up our chat with your private RPGs. I know this sounds wild, but maybe we should prevent roleplay all together, not sure about this suggestion of mine.

While it is enforced well with the current set of rules, some users not gonna mention any names continue to roleplay even after being warned a lot of times. Except the idea of "banning mlp chat room playing all together. But once it starts getting 'serisous' or embrassasing for some people; me for example Yeah, I hate when people hide behind me like that. That is when it needs to be ended. Sort of a "Get a Room" idea.

The amount of roleplaying in chat has increased recently. Roleplaying in main chat is only between 2 Users most of the time, as mentioned by Filly. The roleplay would continue mlp chat room a moderator gives them a warning, and they would proceed with the roleplaying after a few minutes, disregarding the warning. Roleplaying should be more strictly enforced, but not prevented. Role-playing has become a serious problem in the chat and I've been guilty of it a few times.

So per everybody above besides the who banning it completely thing. These "RP actions" are typically warned for, as any RP over 3 lines long begins to clog up chat. Excessive RP can get annoying and can clog the flow of the chat, mlp chat room, and it should be stopped. I'd be willing to support a rule for this, but I don't think mlp chat room should ban roleplay altogether.

A bit of RP here and there is acceptable. You can see it here. Not to be rude or anything. I have always supported that rule, I just don't think that minor roleplay should mlp chat room discouraged. In my opinion, chat users should have that freedom. The most common form of this that I have seen involves FlutterBot's "! I had a dream last night, and at first I didn't know where I was or if anyone else was around and the next two mature women kissing I see is someone Who was it?

Princess Luna herself! DivineGuard December 17, First step: Invitations. Who would I invite to this party? DivineGuard October 20, One day in Equestria The first thing I would do is make my way to Canterlot, run past all the guards and see Celestia and Mlp chat room. To see these two gorgeous princesses in person would be the greatest thing in the world, and i'd tell them how much i admire and respect the two of them for everything they do for their kingdom and for everypony is simply amazing.

Then, if they allowed me, I'd mlp chat room both of them the biggest hugs in the world and tell them how beautiful and amazing they are.

Mlp chat room [PUNIQRANDLINE-(au-dating-names.txt)